benchmarks / opsis-vs-maigret
Opsis vs Maigret
On a verified handle with 27 real accounts, Opsis premium found 23 at 100% precision and Maigret all sites (-a) found 14 at 11% precision. On usernames that don't exist, Opsis premium reported 0 false hits per run and Maigret all sites (-a) 110.
scores
| tool | real found | recall | precision | false hits | false hits / control | time | cost / search |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opsis premium | 23 / 27 | 85% | 100% | 0 | 0 (1 run) | 112s | 2 credits |
| Opsis | 19 / 27 | 70% | 100% | 0 | 0 (1 run) | 111s | 1 credit |
| Maigret all sites (-a) | 14 / 27 | 52% | 11% | 108 +5 dup | 110 (4 runs) | 6m | free |
Run 2026-10-30. How this was measured →
which real accounts each found
The 27 verified accounts, split by who found them (any tier counts).
- both
- 12 chess, discord, faceit, genius, github, hackerone, leetcode, minecraft, steam, twitch, twitter, typeracer
- only Opsis
- 12 cracked, crafty, cs2, epic, fishbrain, fortnitetracker, leafly, malibucrew, microsoft, modio, pinterest, survev
- only Maigret
- 2 polymarket, xboxgamertag
- neither
- 1 tiktok
false positives
- Opsis: 0 false hits on the verified handle; 0 per nonexistent username (1 run).
- Opsis premium: 0 false hits on the verified handle; 0 per nonexistent username (1 run).
- Maigret all sites (-a): 108 false hits on the verified handle plus 5 redundant; 110 per nonexistent username (4 runs).
premium vs standard
- Opsis premium: +5 (cracked, fishbrain, fortnitetracker, leafly, malibucrew), −1 (genius) vs standard.
other usernames (unscored)
| tool | jasondraper01 | example |
|---|---|---|
| Opsis | 8 · 100s | 281 · 54s |
| Opsis premium | 6 · 111s | 316 · 113s |
| Maigret all sites (-a) | 110 · 6m | 599 · 4.9h |
more: Opsis vs OSINT Industries · Opsis vs Sherlock · OSINT Industries vs Maigret · Sherlock vs Maigret